Skip to content
AuditAEMonitorChatGPTTool · pay-per-check

ChatGPT brand monitoring tool

The ChatGPT brand monitoring tool that shows whether ChatGPT mentions your brand when it answers questions in your category. Monitor brand references in ChatGPT in real time — mentions, citations, and competitors — with run-to-run history. Pay-per-use, $5 free credit, no subscription.

$5 free credit · No card on file · ~3 mins setup

Try it

See what ChatGPT says about any brand right now.

One prompt × four engines. No signup, no card — share-of-voice panel in about 30 seconds.

Free citation checkNo signup
Or preview one first.

We check all 4 engines

1 prompt × 4 engines · ~30 seconds · no card required

ChatGPT brand monitoring, by the numbers.

  • weekly active ChatGPT users

    Source: OpenAI, Feb 2026

  • of all AI referral traffic comes from ChatGPT

    Source: Conductor 2026 AEO/GEO Benchmarks

  • visitor-to-conversion rate vs 1.76% from Google organic (B2B)

    Source: Seer Interactive, GA4 Oct 2024 – Apr 2025

  • of ChatGPT answers skip web search and rely on training data alone

    Source: Semrush 17-month clickstream study, Apr 2026

  • native analytics — no dashboard, no Search Console, no referrer in most clicks

Those are the odds you’re optimizing against. See how to rank on ChatGPT and how we measure citations.

Stats current as of Q2 2026. Sources: OpenAI, Conductor, Seer Interactive, Semrush. Verifiable against public reports.

Why ChatGPT brand monitoring is different from SEO

ChatGPT names brands from two pipelines at once: training-data recall (what the model already knew about you when it was trained) and live web search (what the OpenAI Responses API pulls in when web_search is enabled). A brand can appear in a ChatGPT answer with no live citation at all — the model just remembers it. That makes ChatGPT the slowest engine to reflect new content, and the engine where authoritative roundups and long-tail mentions compound the hardest.

It's also the lowest-citation engine of the four. In AuditAE's checks through the OpenAI Responses API with web search on, ChatGPT linked the audited brand's own site in only 52% of the answers that named the brand, and 15% of its answers cited no sources at all. Tools that only parse citation lists miss about half of ChatGPT's brand mentions. Monitoring the answer body itself is the only way to get a real number.

Practically, this means ChatGPT brand monitoring is less about chasing weekly movement (you won't see much) and more about catching when you fall out of the trusted shortlist for a category — which is the moment a competitor's PR or content campaign has finally compounded enough to displace you in the model's recall.

Monitor ChatGPT brand mentions

ChatGPT mentions monitoring comes down to one question asked many times: when a buyer asks ChatGPT about your category, does the answer name you? AuditAE asks ChatGPT your buyer questions through the OpenAI Responses API with web search on, then records whether your brand was named, whether your site was among the sources, and which competitors were named instead.

Mentions and links split further apart on ChatGPT than on any of the other default engines. Across 1,137 ChatGPT checks in AuditAE audits (74 sites, May–September 2026), ChatGPT named the audited brand in 20% of answers but linked the brand's own site in only 11%. When it named a brand, it sent the source link somewhere else 48% of the time. A tracker that only counts citations would miss about half of your ChatGPT mentions.

That's why AuditAE reports mentions and citations as two numbers, keeps every run, and shows the trend per prompt, so you can see a mention turn into a citation after you fix a page or catch the week a competitor replaces you. Start with the free check on this page: it runs one question on ChatGPT and three other engines without signing up.

How we count: 1,137 successful ChatGPT checks from AuditAE audits run May–September 2026 across 74 sites, cached repeats excluded. "Linked" means the audited site's own domain was in the answer's source list. The sites are a mix of customer brands and sample audits, so read these as directional, not an industry benchmark.

What AuditAE captures in every ChatGPT answer.

01

Brand mentions

Whether your brand is named anywhere in the answer body — not just whether the answer cites your URL. Most teams undercount visibility by 2–4× because they only parse citation lists.

02

Citation sources

The full set of URLs the engine cited alongside your brand (or instead of it). Every cited domain is a content gap or an outreach target.

03

Competitors named

Every other brand the engine surfaced for the same prompt. The brands cited instead of you are your real competitive set on AI search — often different from the deck.

04

Position in answer

Where in the response the first mention of your brand appears. Earlier mentions are read more often; later ones are decoration. Character index, normalized.

05

Sentiment

Whether the mention is positive, neutral, or negative. Most AI mentions are neutral; flagged ones are usually paraphrasing a third-party negative review worth tracking down.

06

Prompt-level trend

Diffs against your last audit so you see which prompts moved, which competitors entered the answer, and which citations were lost — not a single-snapshot score.

Here’s what an AuditAE report looks like.

A real AuditAE audit for Yoast — buyer prompts run against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, scored for brand mentions, cited sources, and share of voice. Nothing simulated.

Same kind of report any signed-in user can run for their own brand.

AI visibility report · May 11, 2026
Yoast logo
57GRADE B
AI Visibility Score
Strong
13 pts to grade A
Mentioned
95%
in answer text
URL cited
45%
as source link
Tested against✓Perplexity✓ChatGPT✓Gemini✓Google AI Overviews5 prompts · 20 checks
You hold 31% share of voice across these prompts — Rank Math is the brand AI engines cite most often instead.
Share-of-voice gap
10 answers mentioned Yoast but sourced a third party instead of yoast.com. The engines know you; the link credit isn’t reaching your site.
Not on the map
1 answer where the engines didn’t mention Yoast at all. These need new content or new third-party anchors, not just an attribution fix.

By engine

Perplexity5 answers
Mentioned80%
4 / 5
URL cited40%
2 / 5
ChatGPT5 answers
Mentioned100%
5 / 5
URL cited60%
3 / 5
Gemini5 answers
Mentioned100%
5 / 5
URL cited40%
2 / 5
Google AI Overviews5 answers
Mentioned100%
5 / 5
URL cited40%
2 / 5

Share of voice

Cite share among you and your tracked competitors, across all queried engines.

  • yoast.com · Yoast9 cites41%
  • aioseo.com 7 cites32%
  • rankmath.com 5 cites23%
  • seopress.org 1 cites5%

Most-cited sources

Every domain the engines referenced — not just competitors — ranked by how many answers cited it.

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptEngineCitationSourcesSentiment
best wordpress seo plugin
PerplexityMentioned only
https://aioseo.com/best-seo-plugins-for-wordpress/https://kopfundstift.de/wordpress-seo-plugins/https://www.hostpress.de/blog/wordpress-seo-plugins-vergleich/https://zapier.com/blog/best-wordpress-seo-plugins/+5 more
positive
best wordpress seo plugin
ChatGPTMentioned only
https://wordpress.org/plugins/wordpress-seo/?utm_source=openaihttps://wordpress.org/plugins/tags/wordpress-seo/?utm_source=openaihttps://en-nz.wordpress.org/plugins/wp-seopress/?utm_source=openaihttps://wordpress.org/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/?utm_source=openai+1 more
positive
best wordpress seo plugin
GeminiMentioned only
https://supporthost.comhttps://zapier.comhttps://icegram.comhttps://wisewand.ai+3 more
neutral
best wordpress seo plugin
Google AI OverviewsMentioned only
https://www.reddit.com/r/seogrowth/comments/1nhdyhr/what_are_the_best_seo_wordpress_plugins_to_help/https://zapier.com/blog/best-wordpress-seo-plugins/https://aioseo.com/best-seo-plugins-for-wordpress/https://www.seopress.org/+7 more
neutral
yoast vs rank math
PerplexityURL cited
https://fatlabwebsupport.com/blog/website-optimization/rank-math-vs-yoast/https://zapier.com/blog/rank-math-vs-yoast/https://onlinemediamasters.com/rank-math-vs-yoast/https://wp-rocket.me/blog/rank-math-seo-vs-yoast/+5 more
negative
yoast vs rank math
ChatGPTURL cited
https://yoast.com/features/seo-analysis/?utm_source=openaihttps://rankmath.com/nl/yoast-alternative/?utm_source=openaihttps://yoast.com/choosing-the-right-wordpress-seo-plugin-for-your-business-yoast-vs-rank-math/?utm_source=openai
positive
yoast vs rank math
GeminiURL cited
https://wp-rocket.mehttps://zapier.comhttps://eesel.aihttps://fatlabwebsupport.com+8 more
neutral
yoast vs rank math
Google AI OverviewsURL cited
https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/vcxy3y/yoast_vs_rank_math/https://yoast.com/choosing-the-right-wordpress-seo-plugin-for-your-business-yoast-vs-rank-math/https://zapier.com/blog/rank-math-vs-yoast/https://onlinemediamasters.com/rank-math-vs-yoast/+5 more
neutral
yoast seo review
PerplexityURL cited
https://nickschaeferhoff.com/yoast-seo-review/https://onlinemediamasters.com/yoast-seo-premium-review/https://yoast.com/testimonials/https://www.clairepaniccia.com/yoast-seo-review/+4 more
positive
yoast seo review
ChatGPTMentioned only
https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/wordpress-seo/reviews/?utm_source=openaihttps://wordpress.org/plugins/wordpress-seo/?utm_source=openai
positive
yoast seo review
GeminiURL cited
https://wpmarmite.comhttps://nickschaeferhoff.comhttps://mavlers.comhttps://isitwp.com+12 more
positive
yoast seo review
Google AI OverviewsURL cited
https://www.reddit.com/r/Wordpress/comments/xozhwg/is_yoast_seo_premium_worth_it/https://www.clairepaniccia.com/yoast-seo-review/https://onlinemediamasters.com/yoast-seo-premium-review/https://yoast.com/testimonials/+9 more
positive
how to do seo on wordpress in 2026
PerplexityMentioned only
https://ilja-schlak.de/wordpress-seo-2026/https://www.hauptstadt-homepage.de/allgemein/seo-fuer-wordpress/https://www.martinkaessler.com/seo-wordpress-2026-der-strategische-guide-fuer-mehr-klicks/https://geo4wp.com/wordpress-seo-checkliste-2026/+5 more
neutral
how to do seo on wordpress in 2026
ChatGPTURL cited
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/seo-starter-guide?utm_source=openaihttps://yoast.com/help/faq-xml-sitemaps-wordpress-yoast-seo/?utm_source=openaihttps://yoast.com/help/xml-sitemaps-in-the-wordpress-seo-plugin/?utm_source=openaihttps://yoast.com/help/implementing-schema-with-yoast-seo/?utm_source=openai+1 more
positive
how to do seo on wordpress in 2026
GeminiMentioned only
https://belovdigital.agencyhttps://eguruz.comhttps://betlace.comhttps://coalitiontechnologies.com+9 more
positive
how to do seo on wordpress in 2026
Google AI OverviewsMentioned only
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/UfyTE-rYN5Mhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNyPGLYBc_Ehttps://www.miniorange.com/blog/how-to-do-seo-for-wordpress-sites/https://medium.com/@saqib01/how-to-build-a-secure-fast-seo-friendly-wordpress-website-in-2026-011615f8d3d6+8 more
positive
best wordpress plugins for AI search visibility
PerplexityNot cited
https://wordpress.org/plugins/spotlight-ai-search-visibility/https://antimanual.spider-themes.net/ai-search-plugins-for-wordpress/https://www.frizerly.com/optimize-wordpress-for-ai-search.htmlhttps://wpengine.com/smart-search/+3 more
neutral
best wordpress plugins for AI search visibility
ChatGPTURL cited
https://yoast.com/help/how-to-use-the-yoast-ai-optimize-feature/?utm_source=openaihttps://rankmath.com/kb/rich-snippets/?utm_source=openaihttps://wordpress.org/plugins/growranko-ai-search-optimizer/?utm_source=openaihttps://wordpress.org/plugins/ai-discovery-files/?utm_source=openai+2 more
positive
best wordpress plugins for AI search visibility
GeminiMentioned only
https://creativethemes.comhttps://wpmayor.comhttps://virtina.comhttps://inclind.com+7 more
neutral
best wordpress plugins for AI search visibility
Google AI OverviewsMentioned only
https://wordpress.org/plugins/spotlight-ai-search-visibility/https://about.ads.microsoft.com/en/blog/post/october-2025/optimizing-your-content-for-inclusion-in-ai-search-answershttps://www.frizerly.com/optimize-wordpress-for-ai-search.htmlhttps://www.reddit.com/r/DigitalMarketing/comments/1rrhl37/how_are_you_optimizing_content_for_ai_search/+16 more
neutral
Run this for your brand $5 free credit · no card on file · results in ~3 minutes

From prompt to report in three steps

  1. Drop in your brand and prompts

    Add 5–20 prompts your buyers actually ask — questions, not keywords. AuditAE runs them on demand or on a schedule, never against a fixed plan.

  2. We query ChatGPT for every prompt

    AuditAE hits the OpenAI Responses API with the web_search tool enabled. ChatGPT's consumer product uses a related web-grounded retrieval layer, but the surfaces are distinct and OpenAI doesn't guarantee parity between them. The Responses API returns the model's answer in JSON with cited URLs attached, and we capture the full answer body plus every source URL.

  3. Read the share-of-voice panel

    See which prompts mention you, which competitors got named instead, which URLs got cited. Re-run in 30 days to track movement.

Curious how we score it? See the full methodology — and what counts as a citation vs a mention.

One audit on AuditAE costs less than a single seat-month on the others.

AuditAE pricing compared with subscription AI visibility tools
ToolEntry priceModelCost · one 5×4 auditPer-domain
AuditAEPay-as-you-go$1.65No — audit any domain
Otterly Lite$29 / monthMonthly subscription$29Tier-dependent
Semrush AI Visibility$99 / month per domainSubscription + per-domain$99 (one domain)Yes — multiplies fast
ProfoundFrom $99 / month (ChatGPT only)Subscription; Enterprise custom$99Yes
Peec AIFrom €89 / monthMonthly subscription€89Yes

A 5-prompt audit across all four engines on AuditAE costs $1.65. The single-audit gap to the cheapest subscription competitor is roughly 18×, and Profound starts at $99/monthfor ChatGPT alone. That’s a different pricing model, not a discount — subscription tools earn their keep at daily enterprise cadences. For monthly or quarterly tracking, pay-per-check wins.

Go deeper: AuditAE vs SEMrush AI visibility, vs Brand24, or the full pay-per-check vs subscription math.

Competitor pricing as of September 2026 — from each vendor’s published pricing page.

Four teams already running it.

In-house SEO

Your CMO is asking whether you show up in AI. Run a 5-prompt audit before the meeting, walk in with the share-of-voice panel, walk out with budget.

Agencies

Audit across all your clients without per-domain pricing. Per-engine breakdowns are screenshot-ready for monthly reports; no SaaS markup squeezing the retainer margin.

Brand managers

Monitor brand perception in the answers buyers actually see. Catch competitive shifts and negative framing weeks before they show up in pipeline reviews.

PR teams

Measure citation lift from campaigns and announcements. The AI surface is where journalists, analysts, and buyers triangulate now — track it like you track press hits.

Questions about ChatGPT brand monitoring.

Looking for the cross-engine view? The complete guide to AI brand monitoring covers methodology, metrics, and a 30-day setup plan across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI Overviews.

Build a fixed list of 5–20 buyer questions in your category, run them through ChatGPT (with web search enabled), and parse each answer for your brand name, competitor names, and the cited source URLs. Manual works for a handful of prompts. AuditAE automates the same workflow against the OpenAI Responses API and returns the data as a structured report — pay-per-use, $5 of free credit on signup, no subscription.

Usually, when web search is on, but not always and not always you. In AuditAE's checks through the OpenAI Responses API with web search on, 85% of ChatGPT answers listed at least one source (a median of 3), and when ChatGPT named the audited brand it linked that brand's own site only 52% of the time. With web search off, ChatGPT answers from training data alone and cites nothing. That's why a ChatGPT brand monitoring tool that only parses citations undercounts visibility: the brand name in the answer body is the impression that matters.

Yes. AuditAE is a ChatGPT mentions monitoring tool: it runs your buyer questions through ChatGPT on demand or on a weekly or monthly schedule and records, per answer, whether ChatGPT named your brand, whether it linked your site, and which competitors it named instead. Each ChatGPT check is 7¢ with $5 free credit on signup, and the free check on this page runs one question without signing up.

SEO measures whether your pages rank in the blue links and whether buyers click through. ChatGPT brand monitoring measures whether your brand is named inside the answer ChatGPT generates — often without any click happening, which is why it doesn't show up in Search Console or Analytics. Same content investments help both, but they answer different questions and need different measurement.

Two timescales. Live web search refreshes per-query (ChatGPT pulls fresh results every time). Training-data recall updates only on model retrains, which happen monthly to quarterly and surface as silent shifts in which brands ChatGPT recommends by default. The implication for monitoring: re-audit ChatGPT on a 30-day cadence to catch model-update shifts; weekly is mostly noise for ChatGPT specifically.

Yes — and you should. The competitors named in an answer that doesn't include you are your real ChatGPT competitive set, which often differs from the one in your sales deck. AuditAE extracts every brand named in every answer; the competitor panel is usually the first thing teams look at on a new audit.

Full-sentence buyer questions, not keywords. ChatGPT is prompt-indexed, not keyword-indexed. 'best CRM small business' returns generic category results; 'What's the best CRM for a five-person consulting firm that needs strong invoicing?' returns specific brand recommendations. Mix three buckets: category prompts ('best X for Y'), comparison prompts ('X vs Y'), and problem prompts ('how do I [the job your product does]'). 5–15 prompts cover most needs.

The reframe matters: ChatGPT doesn't have a SERP, so there are no rankings to track in the traditional SEO sense. What a ChatGPT SEO tracking tool actually measures is whether ChatGPT names your brand in the answer body, whether it cites your URL as a source when web search is on, and which competitors get named in the same answers. AuditAE captures all three on every audit against the OpenAI Responses API, alongside Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews so you can see ChatGPT's behavior in context. Pay-per-use with $5 free credit on signup — substantially cheaper than subscription competitors ($29–$499/month) for monthly audit cadences.

AuditAE is built for exactly this: it runs your buyer prompts through ChatGPT (OpenAI Responses API with web search) and reports whether your brand is named, whether your URL is cited, and which competitors appear instead — across ChatGPT plus Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Pay-per-use at 7¢ per ChatGPT check (5–12¢ across engines) with $5 free on signup, so you can track ChatGPT visibility without a subscription.

Yes. AuditAE runs a fixed prompt set on a schedule and records, per run, how often ChatGPT names your brand in the answer and how often it recommends a competitor instead — so you can see your recommendation rate and share of voice trend over time, not just a one-off snapshot.

AuditAE persists every audit run, so you get run-to-run history: which prompts you gained or lost, how your ChatGPT mention and citation rates move after a content or PR push, and how your share of voice trends against competitors. Historical data is the point — a single snapshot can't tell you whether you're rising or falling out of ChatGPT's shortlist.

Subscription tools run roughly $29–$499/month. AuditAE is pay-per-use instead: 5–12¢ per (prompt × engine) check, priced at what each engine costs us to run (Perplexity 5¢, ChatGPT 7¢, Google AI Overviews 9¢, Gemini 12¢), so a 5-prompt audit across ChatGPT plus three more engines is $1.65, with $5 of free credit on signup and no subscription. For monthly or quarterly audit cadences that's far cheaper than an always-on seat.

Yes. Because billing is per-check rather than per-seat or per-domain, agencies can run ChatGPT brand monitoring across many client brands and pay only for the audits they run — no per-client subscription. Each audit produces a shareable report you can hand to the client, covering ChatGPT alongside Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.

ChatGPT is one of four default engines on every audit. Google AI Mode is an opt-in fifth.

Curious how the same prompt gets a different answer on each engine? Our methodology explains how AuditAE queries each one, and how it works walks through a full audit end to end.

Ready when you are

See what ChatGPT says
about your brand tonight.

Sign up, drop in your brand and 5 prompts. AuditAE queries ChatGPT (and Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews) and returns the share-of-voice panel in about three minutes. $5 in free credit; no card on file.

$5 in free credit · No card on file · Results in ~3 minutes